I was bit by this before. row.names are supposed to be characters, and
they are until around 2.3 iirc. Then at 2.4, they started storing it
as integers presumably to save space (and probably because ints are
more low-maintenance data types than strings). So to the user (e.g.
through row.names() ) t
I mean, starting 2.4 not all row names are stored as characters, some
are stored as integers.
On 7/16/07, miguel manese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was bit by this before. row.names are supposed to be characters, and
> they are until around 2.3 iirc. Then at 2.4, they started storing it
> as in
The question which is whether the way identical works is desirable
or intended.
On 7/15/07, miguel manese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean, starting 2.4 not all row names are stored as characters, some
> are stored as integers.
>
> On 7/16/07, miguel manese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was
