Yes, I think all your propositions would be improvements.
OTOH, I don't think the improvements warrant a big increase in
code (complexity), nor do I think the improvements are crucial
for R's integrity.
So...
If you (our someone else) provides a patch {against
R-devel, as always} which keeps the
Hi All,
I find myself wondering if there is a canonical means of achieving the
multiple-dispatch version of 'super'? Specifically, I have a set of
classes
A, B, X and Y where B extends A
and a method Foo with the signature (X,A,Y) and I'd like to implement
Foo with the signature (X,B,Y) such tha
"Byron Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I find myself wondering if there is a canonical means of achieving the
> multiple-dispatch version of 'super'? Specifically, I have a set of
> classes
>
> A, B, X and Y where B extends A
>
> and a method Foo with the signature (X,A,Y) and I'd
Yup, that does it---I knew there was something but couldn't remember
what it was :-)
On 12/11/06, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Byron Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I find myself wondering if there is a canonical means of achieving the
> > multiple-dispatch ve
