Dear all,
After installing R 2.4.0, a definition of "[" for an S4 class has
stopped working as the default for drop in the generic, TRUE, appears to
override the default in the method
The method is defined for demonstration purposes as
setMethod("[", signature(x="FLQuant"),
function(x, i
Dear list,
I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for
which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-2-4-branch, and which I
compiled on my Fedora Core 5 machine. No problems there. I have just
updated the source tree today and re-compiled - which also works just
fine.
Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for
> which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-2-4-branch, and which I
> compiled on my Fedora Core 5 machine. No problems there. I have just
> updated the source tr
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:03 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for
> > which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-2-4-branch, and which I
> > compiled on my Fedora
I think the problem in your case comes from the mechanism used to handle
non-standard argument lists; notice that you have added 3 new
arguments. If you look at the body of the resulting method you will see
that the mechanism used to handle this (defining a function .local)
fails to copy the d
Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:03 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> > Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > I have been using and testing the alpha/betas of R 2.4.0, sources for
> > > which I got from svn.r-project.org/R/bra
Thanks. I think your analysis is probably correct. Will look into
this and fix shortly.
Best,
luke
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: David Hinds
> Version: 2.4.0
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (64.168.232.238)
>
>
> A (maybe naive) use of tryCatch to trap e
El mié, 04-10-2006 a las 09:52 -0400, John Chambers escribió:
> I think the problem in your case comes from the mechanism used to handle
> non-standard argument lists; notice that you have added 3 new
> arguments.
Yes, our object is always 5 dimensional. We could use (...) but it
looked overly c
Hi,
are there corresponding methods to exists() and get() where one can
stratify on class, e.g.
exists(..., inherits) instead of exists(..., mode)?
Thanks
Henrik
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Full_Name: Andrew J. Duba
Version: 2.4.0
OS: OS X
Submission from: (NULL) (128.252.95.46)
I am trying to compile the newest version of R. I am using g77 version 3.4.3
and gcc 4.0. After running gnu make (version 3.8) I get the following error:
Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical
Hi all,
update.default, which is the method used to update "lm" objects (among
others), extracts the "call" element from it's first argument, updates
it, then evaluates it in the parent.frame(). Shouldn't it be evaluated
in environment(formula(object)), if that's non-NULL?
I ask because I cal
Hi all,
update.default, which is the method used to update "lm" objects (among
others), extracts the "call" element from it's first argument, updates
it, then evaluates it in the parent.frame(). Shouldn't it be evaluated
in environment(formula(object)), if that's non-NULL?
I ask because I call "
Hi,
It seems that, when I use weights during an initial least-squares
regression fit, and later try to add terms using stepAIC(), it uses the
weights when looking to remove terms, but not when looking to add them:
hills.lm <- lm(time ~ dist + climb, data = hills, weights = 1/dist^2)
small.hills
Full_Name: Brad Christoffersen
Version: 2.3.1
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (128.196.193.132)
Why is the difference between two numbers so different from the "mean relative
difference" output from the all.equal() function? Is this an artifact of the
way R stores numerics? I could not f
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 03:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Brad Christoffersen
> Version: 2.3.1
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (128.196.193.132)
>
>
> Why is the difference between two numbers so different from the "mean relative
> difference" output from the all.equal()
Dear list,
The last R-devel snapshot (2006-10-03) is an empty tarball:
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/
Thanks,
H.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
I've tracked down where this is occurring, but I don't know how to fix
it. Here's a summary:
If the language in Windows is set to simplified Chinese (i.e. Chinese
(PRC)) and message translations are installed, then on startup Rgui
crashes when it tries to install the console popup menu. The c
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 20:22 -0500, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 03:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Full_Name: Brad Christoffersen
> > Version: 2.3.1
> > OS: Windows XP
> > Submission from: (NULL) (128.196.193.132)
> >
> >
> > Why is the difference between two numbers so dif
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 21:57 -0500, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 20:22 -0500, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 03:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Full_Name: Brad Christoffersen
> > > Version: 2.3.1
> > > OS: Windows XP
> > > Submission from: (NULL) (128.196.193
19 matches
Mail list logo
