> "Gabor" == Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:34:48 -0400 writes:
Gabor> Using "R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable)
Gabor> (2006-08-08 r38825)" on Windows XP and starting in a
Gabor> fresh session we get an error if we type BOD. (The
<>
--please do not edit the information below--
Version:
platform = i686-redhat-linux-gnu
arch = i686
os = linux-gnu
system = i686, linux-gnu
status =
major = 2
minor = 2.1
year = 2005
month = 12
day = 20
svn rev = 36812
language = R
Locale:
C
Search Path:
.GlobalEnv, package:m
<>
When invoking "uniroot" with any argument named "u", uniroot exits
with error: "Error in f(lower, ...) : argument "u" is missing, with no
default". This error occurs whether or not "u" determines the root.
Giving "u" a default value results in garbage from uniroot.
## Define a function with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> <>
>
> When invoking "uniroot" with any argument named "u", uniroot exits
> with error: "Error in f(lower, ...) : argument "u" is missing, with no
> default". This error occurs whether or not "u" determines the root.
>
> Giving "u" a default value results in garbage
You seem not to understand that 'u' matches 'upper' by the standard
argument-matching rules.
test<-function(x,u) (x-u)^3
debug(uniroot)
uniroot(test,c(0,1), u=.75)
Browse[1]> match.call()
uniroot(f = test, interval = c(0, 1), upper = 0.75)
Please learn to use R's debugging facilities (see `Writ
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think some R-core members would welcome a detailed proposal on how
> 'SystemRequirements' should be formatted -- maybe even accompanied
> by R code to parse it. That's a topic also quite well fit to be
> discussed in "this theatre" ..
Discussion f
Hi list,
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature but I can't download a package
that requires a more recent version of R than the one I'm currently
using for the download:
> rep <- "http://bioconductor.org/packages/1.9/bioc";
> download.packages("Biobase", destdir=".", repos=rep)
Wa
As you may already know, the MiKTeX distribution just went through a major
upgade: from 2.4 to 2.5 with some major changes in the configuration files
and directory structure. SInce I routinely build new versions of R-patched
and R-dvel from tarballs (this includes PDF documentation) I wnated to
ch
On 8/11/2006 8:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As you may already know, the MiKTeX distribution just went through a major
> upgade: from 2.4 to 2.5 with some major changes in the configuration files
> and directory structure. SInce I routinely build new versions of R-patched
> and R-dvel from ta
I am working on a package that includes some Fortran 90 source
code, it builds and functions correctly, but I did run into a
little problem when building the Windows version that I thought
might of interest.
In 'Writing R Extensions' (2.3.1, 01 Jun 2006), the authors note
that .f90 code can be use
10 matches
Mail list logo
