Emails to
Edgar Acuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Federico C. F. Calboli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Hao Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lopaka Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Maria Kocherginsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
as maintainers of CRAN packages with QC problems that need addressing
for the upcoming 2.3.0 re
Hi,
forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
been troubleshooting soo much I've been shoting over the target. Here
is a much smaller reproducible example:
x <- 1:10
y <- 1:10 + rnorm(length(x))
sp <- sm
Hi,
yesterday I got very useful feedback on what is the best way to return
a function from a function.
Now, I run into a problem calling a returned function that down the
stream uses Recall(). Below is a self-contained example. I took away
yesterday's code for returning a minimal environment fo
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Is
>
>>the enter point Fortran "orderdata_" absent of the loading table.
>
> a manual translation, and was the underscore there in the original (I
> think it should be, but am just checking).
The extra underscore added is the default behavior of many fortran
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
> the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
> been troubleshooting soo much I've been shoting over the target. Here
> is a much smaller reproducible e
> Prof Brian Ripley writes:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
>> the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
>> been troubleshooting soo much I've been shoting over the target.
On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
> > the function is returned from a function. Sorry about that. I've
> > been troubleshooting soo much I've b
Here I think S3 dispatch is very natural. Try the following:
page <- function(x, method = c("dput", "print"), ...) UseMethod("page")
page.getAnywhere <- function(x, ..., idx=NULL) {
name <- x$name;
objects <- x$obj;
if (length(objects) == 0)
stop("no object named '", name, "' was foun
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Here I think S3 dispatch is very natural. Try the following:
I don't: it is documented to work on a name not an object.
> page <- function(x, method = c("dput", "print"), ...) UseMethod("page")
>
> page.getAnywhere <- function(x, ..., idx=NULL) {
>
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
>>> the function is returned from a function. Sorry about tha
On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> forget about the below details. It is not related to the f
On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Here I think S3 dispatch is very natural. Try the following:
>
> I don't: it is documented to work on a name not an object.
What comes first, the documentation of a method or the method its
Folks,
I would find it useful to have a formula method for
stripchart() with 'data' and 'subset' arguments, similar
to boxplot.formula() whose code can probably be adapted
fairly easily.
Comments?
Peter Ehlers
(Win XP)
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailin
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
>> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>>
Hi,
forget about the below details. It is not related to the fact that
th
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Luke Tierney wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Now, I was a little surprised that Recall() needed to do a lookup, but R's
>> context only contains the name of the called function and not (a pointer
>> to) the function.
>
> I think the callf
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Peter Ehlers wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would find it useful to have a formula method for
> stripchart() with 'data' and 'subset' arguments, similar
> to boxplot.formula() whose code can probably be adapted
> fairly easily.
>
> Comments?
Are you offering to provide one?
(Actually
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/5/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> forget abo
Full_Name: Chris Andrews
Version: 2.2.1
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (128.205.94.95)
The function page for uniroot indicates
If the algorithm does not converge in 'maxiter' steps, a warning
is printed and the current approximation is returned.
I have not been able to get a warni
Sorry, I should have been clearer. This is definitely not
a high-priority item and I hadn't intended it to be
included for 2.3.0.
Sure, I'll provide the code and help page adjustment.
Peter Ehlers
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Peter Ehlers wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would find
19 matches
Mail list logo
