> "Herve" == Herve Pages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:10:58 -0800 writes:
Herve> Hi,
Herve> Today I downloaded and compiled the last R-devel snapshot.
Herve> The SVN-REVISION in the tarball contains the following:
Herve> Revision: 36792
Herve> Last
Hillary, Richard M wrote:
> Morning chaps, I have a little question for your capable minds... Say
> I have an observed and predicted set of quants (in my case, length
> frequencies by year and age/length), is there a way to use lattice
> plots to plot the observed and predicted data together, pane
Excellent, thanks man!
Rich
-Original Message-
From: ernesto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 December 2005 10:32
To: Hillary, Richard M; Iago Mosqueira; Mailing List R; R-devel
Subject: Re: Overlaying lattice plots
Hillary, Richard M wrote:
> Morning chaps, I have a little question
ernesto wrote:
>Hillary, Richard M wrote:
>
>
>
>>Morning chaps, I have a little question for your capable minds... Say
>>I have an observed and predicted set of quants (in my case, length
>>frequencies by year and age/length), is there a way to use lattice
>>plots to plot the observed and predi
There seems to be a problem here, probably of my own making...
flqs <- FLQuants(list(observed=obs, fitted=fits))
xyplot(data~age,data=flqs)
Error in tmp[subset] : object is not subsettable
?
-Original Message-
From: ernesto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 December 2005 10:32
To:
Full_Name: nobody
Version: 2.2.0
OS: any
Submission from: (NULL) (219.66.34.183)
2 x 2 table, such as
> x
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 10 12
[2,] 11 13
> chisq.test(x)
Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates'
continuity correction
data: x
X-squared = 0.0732, df = 1, p-value = 0
This is the same as PR#8265, from a person also not giving his/her name
but sharing your ISP. Please don't submit a repeat, as the FAQ asks.
After last time this was raised, I checked Yates' original paper and
Fisher's book and it seems that R's formula follows what they say.
Do remember that
This is the same as PR#8265, which was reported two months ago by someone
else from syd.odn.ne.jp. It still isn't a bug. According to Brian
Ripley's response at that time, "almost all" the sources he checked gave
the correction that R uses.
-thomas
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECT
Well, I'm finally getting around to setting up a cross-compiler for Windows on
my local Linux box. I'm using the Yan & Rossini's docuimentation and the
latest 'http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Makefile-rcb' , which is working
of the R-2.2.0 sources.
After discovering that "cp -p" doesn'
A few hours ago, I was making a small point on the R-SIG-robust
mailing list on the point that ifelse() was not too efficient
in a situation where pmax() could easily be used instead.
However, this has reminded me of some timing experiments that I
did 13 years ago with S-plus -- where I found th
I've seen that error before. It has to do with the setup of R_EXE. A
current linux R is required. The following order worked for me:
make linuxR
make LinuxFresh=YES mkrules
make R
Jun
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Warnes, Gregory R wrote:
>
> Well, I'm finally getting around to setting up a cross-comp
Thanks, the default version of R here is 2.1.0, so that must have been the
problem. Everything is working now.
-Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Jun Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 1:07 PM
> To: Warnes, Gregory R
> Cc: R-devel (E-mail); Anthony Rossini
DevelopeRs:
I think it might be useful to add a link to oneway.test() on
the kruskal.test() help page.
("R version 2.3.0, 2005-12-09")
Peter Ehlers
U of Calgary
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
I found writing the following default method the for the generic
function "julian" causes R to crash.
julian.default <- function(x, ...) {
x <- as.Date(x)
NextMethod("julian", x, ...)
}
Here is a test example
> m <- as.Date("1972-09-27") + 0:10
> m
[1] "1972-09-27" "1972-09-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I found writing the following default method the for the generic
> function "julian" causes R to crash.
>
>
> julian.default <- function(x, ...) {
> x <- as.Date(x)
> NextMethod("julian", x, ...)
> }
On Windows XP R 2.2.0 Patched (2005-11-21 r36410) you
Thanks Hendrik.
My main concern is that it should not be so easy to crash R.
On whether or not NextMethod from within the default method is kosher or
not - I would have thought so, but clearly I'm wrong here. Perhaps
NextMethod within a default method should be something that at least
attracts a
16 matches
Mail list logo
