Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
>>of an .Rd file that the code still shows.
>>
>>Has anyone else seen this?
>>
>>Are there any packages that use this facility that I cou
The configure script runs fine, but when I compile todays alpha version
of R-2.2.0 (R-alpha_2005-09-10_r35546.tar.gz) under FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT
from Sept. 4th I get the following output:
[...]
gcc -I../../src/extra/zlib -I../../src/extra/bz
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
>>MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
>>Unfortunately, the changes are not compatible with other TeX packages,
James Wettenhall wrote:
> Thanks very much to Uwe, Duncan and Seth (who replied off the list).
>
> Uwe - That section of the R for Windows FAQ was very useful - thanks!
> Sorry I posted a question involving C/Fortran to R-Help.
>
> Duncan - Thanks for all the useful info. I've bookmarked the pa
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT),
> Thomas Lumley (TL) wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>> I personally put NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'inst'
>> directory of all my source packages. This has the effect of copying them
to the
>> top
> Gabor Grothendieck writes:
> On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
>> of an .Rd file that the code still shows.
>>
>> Has anyone else seen this?
>>
>> Are there any packages that use this facility
> Thomas Lumley writes:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>> How about if there were just a standard location and name such as inst/NEWS,
>> inst/WISHLIST, inst/THANKS (which has the advantage that they are
>> automatically
>> made available in the built package under the curren
On 9/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT),
> > Thomas Lumley (TL) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >>
> >> I personally put NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'inst'
> >> directory of all my sour
On 9/10/05, Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gabor Grothendieck writes:
>
> > On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
> >> of an .Rd file that the code still shows.
> >>
> >> Has anyone else
On 9/10/05, Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thomas Lumley writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >> How about if there were just a standard location and name such as
> >> inst/NEWS,
> >> inst/WISHLIST, inst/THANKS (which has the advantage that they are
> >>
On 9/10/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thomas Lumley writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > >> How about if there were just a standard location and name such as
> > >> inst/NEWS,
> > >> i
On 9/10/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Gabor Grothendieck writes:
> >
> > > On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
> > >>
On 9/10/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
> >>MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
> >>Unfort
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>>>On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to b
I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
the web.
--
Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chair School of Medicine
Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
> I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
> whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
> needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
> the web.
From a repositoriy maintainer's point of
On 9/10/05, Frank E Harrell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
> whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
> needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
> the web.
Normally I wou
Duncan,
>> Seth - Thanks for suggesting valgrind. I tried it out, and it correctly
>> told me that memory leakage was not the problem (although I didn't
>> believe it at first).
>
> Is there a version of valgrind that works in Windows now, or did you do
> this test somewhere else?
>
> Duncan Murd
On 10 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I like the suggestion about using a Changelog (or whatever it would
> be called) field in the package DESCRIPTION meta-data. If we have
> that, we could not only use this for repository-side presentation of
> the package, but also install such info and ha
>
> Standard location or a mechachanism like the one you describe are both
> similar amount of work (and not much at all), the HTML pages are
> generated by perl and I have the parsed DESCRIPTION file there, i.e.,
> using a fixed name or the value of the Changelog field is basically
> the same.
>
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
> And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
> location or existence of the various subdirectories such as R, man,
> exec, etc. If NEWS is to be recorded as a meta data line item in
> DESCRIPTION then surely all of these should
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
> I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
> whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
> needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
> the web.
Yes, this would be nice.
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Seth Falcon wrote:
> For what its worth, I don't like this idea of adding a ChangeLog field
> to the DESCRIPTION file.
>
> Agreeing upon a standard location for NEWS or CHANGES or some such
> seems a more simple solution. As long as the presence of such a file
> is *optional*.
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Frank E Harrell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
>>whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
>>needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and ar
> "TL" == Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:32:29 -0700 (PDT) writes:
>> Standard location or a mechachanism like the one you
>> describe are both similar amount of work (and not much at
>> all), the HTML pages are generated by perl and I have the
On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >
> > And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
> > location or existence of the various subdirectories such as R, man,
> > exec, etc. If NEWS is to be recorded as a meta d
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>>>On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to b
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>>
>>> And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
>>> location or existence of the various subdirectories such as R, man,
>
On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
> > On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >>>
> >>> And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
> >>> lo
These were found by AC_CHECK_FUNCS (please confirm what configure said) so
most likely some macro needs to be set or header included.
Could you please find out how configure managed to find cpow etc when they
appear not to be in libc/libm?
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> The confi
30 matches
Mail list logo
