[Rd] Use of PACKAGE= argument in .C etc calls

2005-06-20 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
As from R 2.0.0, R CMD check has not flagged .C etc calls without a PACKAGE argument in packages with a namespace. Unfortunately that was based on too optimistic assumptions. 1) The mechanism to find the DLL from the namespace only works if the DLL is declared via a useDynLib declaration in NA

[Rd] capabilities() and non-catchable messages

2005-06-20 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Just for the record (not a request for fix) and an ad hoc workaround if anyone needs it: REASON: Running an R script as a plugin on a remote Suse Linux 8.2 with R v2.1.0 (2005-04-18), I have noticed that capabilities() generates (to standard error) Xlib: connection to "base:0.0" refused by

Re: [Rd] capabilities() and non-catchable messages

2005-06-20 Thread Roger D. Peng
Would using 'capture.output()' work for you in this case? -roger Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Just for the record (not a request for fix) and an ad hoc workaround if > anyone needs it: > > REASON: > Running an R script as a plugin on a remote Suse Linux 8.2 with R v2.1.0 > (2005-04-18), I have no

[Rd] Craving for Rolexes or omegas? (PR#7959)

2005-06-20 Thread elwo
Don't extract every cent from youraccount just to gget one brandname vvatch. Flnd affordableones from Rolexes, Cartiers, Bvlgaries, FrankMullers, Harry Winstons, Breguets, Jaeger-lecoultre, Brietilings, Tag Heuers and Tudors. See our convincing beauties that have logos and SerialNumber. We are arti

Re: [Rd] capabilities() and non-catchable messages

2005-06-20 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
No; I've tried/do that too. /Henrik Roger D. Peng wrote: > Would using 'capture.output()' work for you in this case? > > -roger > > Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > >>Just for the record (not a request for fix) and an ad hoc workaround if >>anyone needs it: >> >>REASON: >>Running an R script as a pl

Re: [Rd] Revised scatter.smooth using xy.coords

2005-06-20 Thread Paul Murrell
Hi Thanks for these suggestions Kevin. These are now in the development version of R. Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This started when I discovered that scatter.smooth (R 2.1.0) has an > undocumented ability to use a formula as the first argument. Then I > discovered the xy.coords function,