Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>>
I presume you are talking about RPMs built with --with-system-zlib?
That's not recommended in the R-admin manual, and perhaps you
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>
>>> I presume you are talking about RPMs built with --with-system-zlib?
>>>
>>> That's not recommended in the R-admin manual, and perhaps you can persuade
>>> Martyn Plummer n
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> I presume you are talking about RPMs built with --with-system-zlib?
>>
>> That's not recommended in the R-admin manual, and perhaps you can
>> persuade
>> Martyn Plummer not to do it.
>
> I've checked, and he no longer
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I presume you are talking about RPMs built with --with-system-zlib?
>
> That's not recommended in the R-admin manual, and perhaps you can
> persuade Martyn Plummer not to do it.
Not quite - the problematic option seems to be "--enable-R-shlib" which
the official RPM w
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I presume you are talking about RPMs built with --with-system-zlib?
>
> That's not recommended in the R-admin manual, and perhaps you can persuade
> Martyn Plummer not to do it.
I've checked, and he no longer does so, sorry. So there is a zlib insi
I presume you are talking about RPMs built with --with-system-zlib?
That's not recommended in the R-admin manual, and perhaps you can persuade
Martyn Plummer not to do it.
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have got a curious issue with an R package which uses zlib, against
>
