> Rui Barradas writes:
Thanks: both fixed now in the trunk with c79004.
Best
-k
> Hello,
> R 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 20.04, sessionInfo() below.
> I believe there are two typos in ?file.path, section Value, 2nd paragraph.
> 1. There is a close parenthesis missing after Encoding, as it is
> readi
Thanks, fixed in R-devel and R-patched.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 22.12.2017 15:28, Korpela Mikko (MML) wrote:
I found three little typos in the ?regex manual. Apologies for the lack of a
diff, as the utility is not (yet) installed on this machine.
1. "There is a also" should probably be "There is
> Mikko Korpela
> on Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:16:49 +0200 writes:
> I found some trivial typos, mostly unmatched parentheses, in the R
> manuals. More information and suggested fixes are in the attached diff
file.
Thank you very much!
They have been applied to the R-devel and R-pa
> "LB" == Luca Braglia
> on Sat, 16 May 2009 22:46:39 +0200 writes:
LB> Hi few typos i've found
Thank you, Luca,
I've fixed all of them {and also moved your "juvenile" :-) bug
report to "*-fulfilled"}.
Regards,
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
LB> ?.C
LB> Specifying 'ENCOD
> If you are going to impose the cost on the developers of a bug report on
> typos, please at least do as we _do_ ask and check the current version, in
> your case at
>
> https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/tcltk/man/TclInterface.Rd
>
> You will I believe want to update your b
If you are going to impose the cost on the developers of a bug report on
typos, please at least do as we _do_ ask and check the current version, in
your case at
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/tcltk/man/TclInterface.Rd
You will I believe want to update your bug report.
On Tue, 2
* On Wed 07:19AM, 19 Apr 2006, Prof Brian Ripley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> By `documentation' do you mean `comments in the file'? If so, this is too
> minor to change whilst R 2.3.0 is in code freeze, but has been changed for
> R-devel.
Yes, I am referring to the comments in the file src/mai
By `documentation' do you mean `comments in the file'? If so, this is too
minor to change whilst R 2.3.0 is in code freeze, but has been changed for
R-devel.
If not, please can we have a more precise indication of where you are
refering to?
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In
Fixed now, thanks.
BTW, supplying patches inline almost always does not work as lines get
wrapped, tabs converted A text attachment should be better.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Stephen D. Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The diffs below are based on revision 37445 and show
> some typo corrections fo
