On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Tony Plate wrote:
> The actual behavior, as far as I can make out, is that all the files in
> the 'tests' directory are copied, but not any subdirectories (which I
> personally would have found useful).
>
> So, saying the "whole directory" is probably not accurate.
I think it
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
> I prefer 'svn praise' myself.
Or 'svn annotate'.
I think it depends on what I'm looking for, plus the risk that the
author (perpetrator, contributor) might be me
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.c
'whole of', as svn up will show you.
I prefer 'svn praise' myself.
BTW, it is very easy to read @file{foo} as 'file foo', and that is a
frequent problem.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Tony Plate wrote:
>> There looks to be a typo in the R-exts manual:
>>
>> The whose @file{tests
The actual behavior, as far as I can make out, is that all the files in
the 'tests' directory are copied, but not any subdirectories (which I
personally would have found useful).
So, saying the "whole directory" is probably not accurate.
-- Tony Plate
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Tony Plate wrote:
Tony Plate wrote:
> There looks to be a typo in the R-exts manual:
>
> The whose @file{tests} is copied to the check area, ...
> ^
>
> I'm not sure what was intended here, so I can't suggest a fix.
>
'svn blame' tells me that this was Brian's addition in rev.35362. There
is no previous
