On 29 October 2006 at 19:29, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
| > ... unless of course all those checkins went to trunk/ aka R-devel.
|
| ... which "svn -r 39733:BASE" on the branch would have told you:
At that point it "couldn't have" as I was quoting
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... unless of course all those checkins went to trunk/ aka R-devel.
... which "svn -r 39733:BASE" on the branch would have told you:
$ svn log -r 39733:BASE
r39734 | hornik |
On 10/29/2006 12:43 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 29 October 2006 at 10:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
> | | but no longer now.
> | | [A "svn cleanup" was needed.
> | | I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now
> |
On 29 October 2006 at 10:29, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
| | but no longer now.
| | [A "svn cleanup" was needed.
| | I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now
| | always before "svn update". This of course is a waste of
On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
| but no longer now.
| [A "svn cleanup" was needed.
| I've amended the cron-job script to do an "svn cleanup" now
| always before "svn update". This of course is a waste of time in
| 99.9% of cases; but it's just a CPU's time, not a person
On 28 October 2006 at 22:15, Martin Maechler wrote:
| > "Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:30:38 -0500 writes:
|
| Dirk> On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote: |
| Dirk> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > I get the tarballs form
|
> "Dirk" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:30:38 -0500 writes:
Dirk> On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote: |
Dirk> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > I get the tarballs form
Dirk> ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R and I | >
D
On 28 October 2006 at 00:18, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| > I get the tarballs form ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R and I
| > noticed that the only R-patched there is dated 2006-10-03, while R-devel is
| > up to 2006-10-25. Did, by any chance, a depository for the R-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the availability of tarballs for 2.4.0-patched.
>
> I routinely compile and install fresh versions of R-patched as well as
> R-devel every few days. I do it mostly "for fun" but also to check for
> possible build problems or problems w
