On 08.02.2016 16:19, peter dalgaard wrote:
Quite possibly, I should keep my big mouth shut and let the CRAN'ers answer
this, but at face value, you submit a new version and are asked to confirm that
problems with the previous version are fixed; isn't that as it should be?
From a CRAN'ers po
Paul, I think it is working as intended / you are seeing correct i nfo. They
are just trying to make sure you have fixed any problems in your previous
package (that is now be being built with a newer R, so problems show up that
weren’t there when you originallly submitted the previous version).
Quite possibly, I should keep my big mouth shut and let the CRAN'ers answer
this, but at face value, you submit a new version and are asked to confirm that
problems with the previous version are fixed; isn't that as it should be?
-pd
On 08 Feb 2016, at 16:10 , Paul Johnson wrote:
> Yesterday
