Re: [Rd] shash in unique.c

On 3/5/10 4:40 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote: Thanks a lot. Quick and brief responses below... "Duncan Murdoch" wrote in message news:4b90f134.6070...@stats.uwo.ca... Matthew Dowle wrote: I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No response resulted in a retry() after a S

Re: [Rd] shash in unique.c

Thanks a lot. Quick and brief responses below... "Duncan Murdoch" wrote in message news:4b90f134.6070...@stats.uwo.ca... > Matthew Dowle wrote: >> I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No >> response resulted in a retry() after a Sys.sleep(10 days). >> >> If its a

Re: [Rd] shash in unique.c

Matthew Dowle wrote: I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No response resulted in a retry() after a Sys.sleep(10 days). If its a "yes" or "maybe" then I could proceed to try it, test it, and present the test results and timings to you along with the patch. It wou

Re: [Rd] shash in unique.c

I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No response resulted in a retry() after a Sys.sleep(10 days). If its a "yes" or "maybe" then I could proceed to try it, test it, and present the test results and timings to you along with the patch. It would be on 32bit Ubuntu