On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Baptiste Auguie
wrote:
> One small technical issue currently limiting the deployment of true
> reproducible wikis based on knitr + github-markdown is the lack of reverse
> synchronisation between the rendered output (markdown), edited online, and
> the original Rmd
One small technical issue currently limiting the deployment of true
reproducible wikis based on knitr + github-markdown is the lack of reverse
synchronisation between the rendered output (markdown), edited online, and
the original Rmd source. It think the combination of wiki features +
reproducible
FWIW, I have created a project for an R wiki engine @ github:
https://github.com/gaborcsardi/r-wiki-engine
The idea is that R developers and users can use this project to create
R wikis, by simply cloning it, or including it as a git submodule.
The basis will be Hadley's setup for his books; this
> Philippe Grosjean
> on Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:45:14 +0200 writes:
> Yihui and Gábor, I agree with you, and I also think that
> using Travis CI would be very nice. However, there are
> hundreds of page on the R wiki to migrate… and syntax is a
> little bit different than
[...]
>> Yes, you are right. I have looked at Pandoc, but it only supports DokuWiki
>> in output, not in input.
>
> Oh, by the way, I found this one:
> https://github.com/ludoza/DokuWiki-to-Markdown-Converter
>
> PhG
An probably you can keep the full history as well:
https://github.com/hoxu/doku
On 09 Sep 2014, at 14:14, Philippe Grosjean wrote:
>
> On 09 Sep 2014, at 13:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 09/09/2014, 2:45 AM, Philippe Grosjean wrote:
>>> Yihui and Gábor,
>>>
>>> I agree with you, and I also think that using Travis CI would be very nice.
>>> However, there are hundre
On 09 Sep 2014, at 13:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 09/09/2014, 2:45 AM, Philippe Grosjean wrote:
>> Yihui and Gábor,
>>
>> I agree with you, and I also think that using Travis CI would be very nice.
>> However, there are hundreds of page on the R wiki to migrate… and syntax is
>> a little b
On 09/09/2014, 2:45 AM, Philippe Grosjean wrote:
> Yihui and Gábor,
>
> I agree with you, and I also think that using Travis CI would be very nice.
> However, there are hundreds of page on the R wiki to migrate… and syntax is a
> little bit different than Markdown.
>
> Of course, a solution wou
Yihui and Gábor,
I agree with you, and I also think that using Travis CI would be very nice.
However, there are hundreds of page on the R wiki to migrate… and syntax is a
little bit different than Markdown.
Of course, a solution would be to start again from scratch, but I think that
those who
I second this suggestion.
One possible complication I see is that if you would like to run the R
code (to display its output for example), then AFAIK you cannot simply
use Jekyll on Github's side, but would need some additional
infrastructure.
It might be possible to use Travis (or some other) CI
I want to make a humble suggestion: migrate the wiki to Github, and
build the pages using Jekyll+Markdown. That way, I think it will
attract more volunteers. Simply look how many pull requests that
Hadley has got for his up-coming book hosted on Github
(http://adv-r.had.co.nz): https://github.com/h
Thank you, Philippe, for the explanation.
Yet again this shows that rather than discussing things in lots of
messages, it is typically most helpful to ask the maintainer what is
going on. The maintainer simply knows best...
Thanks again,
Uwe
On 08.09.2014 19:10, Philippe GROSJEAN wrote:
U
Uwe and all,
I have problems with the R wiki engine. It seems that there is a systematic
attack of the R wiki site that produces an overconsumption of the server's CPU,
and consequently, my provider did shutdown the whole SciViews.org web site.
Now, it is a bad time for me to work on this (very
Rather than asking here, I'd ask Philippe Grosjean directly, hence CCIng.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.09.2014 01:17, André Z. D. A. wrote:
This does not answer you, but if you are looking for something that existed on
that wiki, it may help:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140112055032/http://rwik
This does not answer you, but if you are looking for something that existed on
that wiki, it may help:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140112055032/http://rwiki.sciviews.org/
doku.php
And that wiki doesn't look like it had a lot of activity:
https://web.archive.org/web/2014030100*/http://rwiki
I also want to express my appreciation to the R Wiki developers. I
used it 6/18/2006 12:46 PM in answering a post to s-news (citing
something I learned from Venables and Ripley).
Best Wishes,
Spencer Graves
Philippe Grosjean wrote:
> Henrik Bengtsson wrote
Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Thank you very much for this Philippe and everyone else who contibuted
> to the R Wiki. Great initiative and work.
>
> I'm interested in the 'R packages section' for adding extra help on my
> packages. What kind of backup is there for the wiki?
>
> Best
>
> Henrik
Fo
Thank you very much for this Philippe and everyone else who contibuted
to the R Wiki. Great initiative and work.
I'm interested in the 'R packages section' for adding extra help on my
packages. What kind of backup is there for the wiki?
Best
Henrik
On 6/18/06, Philippe Grosjean <[EMAIL PROTEC
18 matches
Mail list logo
