Re: [Rd] problem in levels<- and other inconsistencies

2016-09-28 Thread jens . oehlschlaegel
Oehlschlägel" , r-devel@r-project.org Betreff: Re: [Rd] problem in levels<- and other inconsistencies Hi, I totally agree that having foo(x) <- foo(x) behave like a no-op is a must. This is something I try to be careful about when I design my own objects and their getters and setters.

Re: [Rd] problem in levels<- and other inconsistencies

2016-09-27 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi, I totally agree that having foo(x) <- foo(x) behave like a no-op is a must. This is something I try to be careful about when I design my own objects and their getters and setters. Just wanted to mention though that there is notorious violation of this: x <- list(3:-1, NULL) x[[2]] <- x[