Hi Simon,
On 10/29/2010 02:57 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
On 10/29/2010 12:17 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
I have no idea what 'timeout' means, but that *should* take an
extraordina
On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/29/2010 12:17 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>>
>>> I have no idea what 'timeout' means, but that *should* take an
>>> extraordinarily long time (it is at least quadrat
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/29/2010 12:17 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>
>> I have no idea what 'timeout' means, but that *should* take an
>> extraordinarily long time (it is at least quadratic in the input
>> length). This is the point of hashing -- you *
Hi,
On 10/29/2010 12:17 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
I have no idea what 'timeout' means, but that *should* take an
extraordinarily long time (it is at least quadratic in the input
length). This is the point of hashing -- you *need* hash=TRUE, and you
should probably also set 'size' in new.env.
I have no idea what 'timeout' means, but that *should* take an
extraordinarily long time (it is at least quadratic in the input
length). This is the point of hashing -- you *need* hash=TRUE, and
you should probably also set 'size' in new.env.
There was an obvious missing PROTECT in this funct
