Re: [Rd] integer

2015-12-17 Thread Gabriel Becker
Adrian, Yes, any "whole" number coming out of a computation bitten by floating point issues, I think. > x = 1/49*49 > x [1] 1 > x%%1 [1] 1 > is.wholenumber <- + function(x, tol = .Machine$double.eps^0.5) abs(x - round(x)) < tol > is.wholenumber(x) [1] TRUE Best, ~G P.S Credit to Hadley Wic

Re: [Rd] integer constants given by hexadecimal notation

2007-05-01 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Stephan" == Stephan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 1 May 2007 13:21:53 +0200 writes: Stephan> Hi, >> 0x10L Stephan> returns: int 0 Stephan> I would expect: int 16? This happens with all Stephan> integer constants given by hexadecimal notation. Stephan> It'

Re: [Rd] integer constants given by hexadecimal notation (PR#9648)

2007-05-01 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 01/05/2007 7:21 AM, Stephan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >>> 0x10L >>> >> returns: int 0 >> >> I would expect: int 16? >> This happens with all integer constants given by hexadecimal notation. >> It's a bug? >> > > Certainly looks like one; I've cc'd this

Re: [Rd] integer constants given by hexadecimal notation (PR#9648)

2007-05-01 Thread ripley
This works correctly on Linux. The problem is that the author assumed that atof handles hexadecimal, which it does for a C99 compiler but not apparently on MinGW. We have a workaround for this in mkFloat, and need to use that for the 'L' suffix case too. On Tue, 1 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Rd] integer constants given by hexadecimal notation (PR#9648)

2007-05-01 Thread murdoch
On 01/05/2007 7:21 AM, Stephan wrote: > Hi, > >> 0x10L > returns: int 0 > > I would expect: int 16? > This happens with all integer constants given by hexadecimal notation. > It's a bug? Certainly looks like one; I've cc'd this to the bug list (but won't be able to look into fixing it). Duncan