On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 14:25 -0800, John Chambers wrote:
> I missed the earlier round of this discussion and only am commenting
> now to say that this doesn't seem weird at all, if I understand what
> you're trying to do.
>
> Martin's basic suggestion,
> v <- callGeneric(e1, as(e2, "A"))
> seems th
I missed the earlier round of this discussion and only am commenting now
to say that this doesn't seem weird at all, if I understand what you're
trying to do.
Martin's basic suggestion,
v <- callGeneric(e1, as(e2, "A"))
seems the simplest solution.
You just want to make another call to the ac
Thanks for your help. I had two concerns about using as: that it would
impose some overhead, and that it would require me to code an explicit
conversion function. I see now that the latter is not true; I don't
know if the overhead makes much difference.
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:00 -0800, Martin
Hi Ross --
Ross Boylan wrote:
>
>
> Martin Morgan wrote:
>> Hi Ross --
>
>> Ross Boylan writes:
>
>>> I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
>>> the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
>>> generic for A. Is there a way to do that?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Morgan wrote:
> Hi Ross --
>
> Ross Boylan writes:
>
>> I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
>> the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
>> generic for A. Is there a way to do th
Hi Ross --
Ross Boylan writes:
> I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of
> the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group
> generic for A. Is there a way to do that?
>
> I would also appreciate any comments if what I'm trying to do seems like
