On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
> It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
> two things:
> (a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
> there really is no way to specify complex constants with non-zero r
On 20 Jan 2014, at 00:00 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone might want to fix this by implementing a full syntax for complex
>>> constants, but meanwhile, I think a passable workaround could be
>>
>> That might be nice to do. Not sure if it's easy or hard...
>
> I think it's hard. Afte
Thank you Peter and Duncan, for the explanation and discussion. As for a
workaround, I think it is more readable to define,
test <- function(a = complex(real=1, imaginary=2)){}
Best regards,
baptiste
On 19 January 2014 18:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 14-01-19 4:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote
On 14-01-19 4:45 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14-01-19 4:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex c
On 14-01-19 4:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex constants with non-zero real part,
i.e. 1+2
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex constants with non-zero real part,
i.e. 1+2i is a sum of a real and and imaginary compl
