On 16.09.2013 13:52, Göran Broström wrote:
On 09/16/2013 12:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-16 3:59 AM, Göran Broström wrote:
On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) an
I haven't used rforge, but I will look check out the scripts. The reason it
would be a six-pack of work is that there are generic build systems that handle
most of this work. What they don't do is act as a repository, so rforge could
remain that while separating out the build process.
On Sep
On 09/16/2013 12:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-16 3:59 AM, Göran Broström wrote:
On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
that's been pretty informative in the past :
On 13-09-15 9:58 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
I've been watching this thread closely and trying not to chime in,
because as Brian Rowe mentioned about CRAN's mysterious absence in a
previous reply.
It's no mystery that they don't discuss CRAN policies on this list.
That's been stated many times. I do
On 13-09-16 3:59 AM, Göran Broström wrote:
On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
that's been pretty informative in the past :
http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html
Ma
On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
that's been pretty informative in the past :
http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html
Mainly though, I submit to winbuilder before s
Ben Bolker wrote :
Do you happen to remember what the technical difficulty was?
From memory I think it was that CRAN maintainers didn't have
access to Uwe's winbuilder machine. But often when I get OK
from winbuilder R-devel I don't want it to go to CRAN yet. So
procedures and software would ha
On Sep 16, 2013, at 01:46 PM, Brian Rowe wrote:
That reminds me: I once made a suggestion on how to automate some of the CRAN
deployment process, but it was shot down as not being useful to them. I do
recall a quote that was along the lines of "as long as you don't need help,
do whatever you wan
That reminds me: I once made a suggestion on how to automate some of the CRAN
deployment process, but it was shot down as not being useful to them. I do
recall a quote that was along the lines of "as long as you don't need help, do
whatever you want", so one thought is to just set up a build ser
I've been watching this thread closely and trying not to chime in,
because as Brian Rowe mentioned about CRAN's mysterious absence in a
previous reply. CRAN is like a ghost in r-devel (or any other mailing
lists) -- everybody is discussing about it, and nobody has ever seen
it. Perhaps one day useR
Matthew Dowle mdowle.plus.com> writes:
>
>
> I'm a little surprised by this thread.
>
> I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
> that's been pretty informative in the past :
> http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html
>
> Mainly though, I submit to winbuil
Something that might be of use to you guys is crant
(https://github.com/muxspace/crant), which is a set of scripts to make package
development and testing simpler. With crant you can build out multiple R
instances (release, patch, devel) and then run the build chain against each
one. It's compa
On 13-09-14 07:20 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-14 12:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not
On 13-09-15 12:52 PM, Michael Friendly wrote:
On 9/13/2013 12:15 PM, John Fox wrote:
If I understand this thread, Michael's package doesn't use loglm() -- it
provides methods for objects produced by loglm() and hence "Enhances" the
package.
Well, here's the rub: vcdExtra uses MASS::loglm() in e
On 9/13/2013 12:15 PM, John Fox wrote:
If I understand this thread, Michael's package doesn't use loglm() -- it
provides methods for objects produced by loglm() and hence "Enhances" the
package.
Well, here's the rub: vcdExtra uses MASS::loglm() in examples, and also
in R code,
where it provides
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
that's been pretty informative in the past :
http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html
Mainly though, I submit to winbuilder before submitting to CRAN, as the
CRAN policies advis
On 14 September 2013 at 19:01, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13-09-14 9:14 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 14 September 2013 at 09:04, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus needs
to b
On 13-09-14 12:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but
On 13-09-14 9:16 AM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
On 09/14/2013 08:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus
needs to be on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of
amazing work which is _tr
On 13-09-14 9:14 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 14 September 2013 at 09:04, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus needs to be
| > on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of amazing work
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
that's been pretty informative in the past :
http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html
Mainly though, I submit to winbuilder before submitting to CRAN, as the
CRAN policies advise.
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact
that we (as
| > in the Rcpp author
On 09/14/2013 08:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus
needs to be on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of
amazing work which is _truly_ appreciated in its thoroughness and
reach) c
On 14 September 2013 at 09:04, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus needs to be
| > on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of amazing work which is
| > _truly_ appreciated in its thorough
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact that we (as
| > in the Rcpp authors) now stand behind an API that also has to acc
Dear Duncan and Michael,
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-bounces@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Duncan Murdoch
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:51 AM
> To: Michael Friendly
> Cc: r-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] declaring
John Fox: (12:15PM on Fri, Sep 13)
[...cut...]
I think that most users --
as opposed to R developers -- will find the package::function( ... ) syntax
in examples not so much ugly as cryptic. I think that we have ample recent
evidence on this list that even developers (I don't exempt myself) are
c
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact that we (as
| > in the Rcpp authors) now stand behind an API that also has to accomodate
| > changes in R CMD check. Case in point
On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 10:38, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| > | b
On 13 September 2013 at 10:38, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| > | but R-devel is an unreleased version, so you won't s
On 13/09/2013 10:37 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 13/09/2013 14:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13/09/2013 8:31 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
>> On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> >
>> > I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
>> > require(MASS) or (probably best) us
On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| but R-devel is an unreleased version, so you won't see the news until it
| is there. Announcing things that nobody ca
On 13/09/2013 14:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13/09/2013 8:31 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
> require(MASS) or (probably best) used MASS::loglm explicitly. It may
> be that in the past some
On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| but R-devel is an unreleased version, so you won't see the news until it
| is there. Announcing things that nobody can try leads to fewer useful
| comments than put
On 13/09/2013 8:31 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
> require(MASS) or (probably best) used MASS::loglm explicitly. It may
> be that in the past some other package put MASS on the search list,
>
On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
require(MASS) or (probably best) used MASS::loglm explicitly. It may
be that in the past some other package put MASS on the search list,
and that's why it worked before.
The distinction i
Michael
(Several of us are struggling with these changes, so my comments are
from the newly initiated point of view, rather than the fully
knowledgeable.)
On 13-09-12 09:38 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
I received the following email note re: the vcdExtra package
A vcd update has shown that
On 12/09/2013 9:38 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
I received the following email note re: the vcdExtra package
> A vcd update has shown that packages TIMP and vcdExtra are not
> declaring their dependence on colorspace/MASS: see
>
> http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_vcdExtra.html
B
38 matches
Mail list logo
