> Achim Zeileis writes:
Thanks---Ivan's fix committed now with c84497.
Best
-k
> Apologies, I missed Ivan's fix to the problem (my day was too long...)
> which is, of course, better than mine.
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023, Achim Zeileis wrote:
>> Thierry,
>>
>> thanks for this, this is a bug in
Apologies, I missed Ivan's fix to the problem (my day was too long...)
which is, of course, better than mine.
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023, Achim Zeileis wrote:
Thierry,
thanks for this, this is a bug in utils:::.format_person_as_R_code(). This
calls deparse() on the elements of the person object with
Thierry,
thanks for this, this is a bug in utils:::.format_person_as_R_code(). This
calls deparse() on the elements of the person object with the default
width.cutoff = 60. As your comment exceeds this width, the erroneous
formatting is produced. The simplest reproducible example I could come
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 16:55:59 +0200
Thierry Onkelinx via R-devel wrote:
> I think I found a bug in utils::format.person when using style = "R"
> with a vector of comments. The comment section is not parsed
> properly.
Good catch! This looks like another occasion of deparse() suddenly
returning a m