Re: [Rd] bounding box in PostScript

2006-04-18 Thread David Allen
Thanks to all who replied. I will try par(mar=). David __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] bounding box in PostScript

2006-04-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Berwin A Turlach wrote: > G'day David, > >> "DA" == David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >DA> When a graph is saved as PostScript, the bounding box is often >DA> too big. A consequence is that when the graph is included in >DA> a LaTeX document, the spaci

Re: [Rd] bounding box in PostScript

2006-04-17 Thread Berwin A Turlach
G'day David, > "DA" == David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DA> When a graph is saved as PostScript, the bounding box is often DA> too big. A consequence is that when the graph is included in DA> a LaTeX document, the spacing does not look good. Is this a DA> recognized p

Re: [Rd] bounding box in PostScript

2006-04-17 Thread Ted Harding
On 17-Apr-06 Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, David Allen wrote: > >> When a graph is saved as PostScript, the bounding box is often too >> big. >> A consequence is that when the graph is included in a LaTeX document, >> the spacing does not look good. >> Is this a recognized proble

Re: [Rd] bounding box in PostScript

2006-04-17 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, David Allen wrote: > When a graph is saved as PostScript, the bounding box is often too big. > A consequence is that when the graph is included in a LaTeX document, > the spacing does not look good. > Is this a recognized problem? Is someone working on it? Could I help? It's