- Original Message -
> From: "Dirk Eddelbuettel"
> To: "Jeroen Ooms"
> Cc: "Simon Urbanek" , "r-devel@r-project.org"
> , "Dirk Eddelbuettel"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 12:07:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] binar
Thank you, Hadley.
It would be great indeed if this can be fixed!
Kind regards,
Tobias
- Original Message -
> From: "hadley wickham"
> To: "Tobias Verbeke"
> Cc: "r-devel@r-project.org"
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 8:32:17 PM
> Subj
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, at 8:07 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On 10 February 2025 at 23:19, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
>> some people prefer installing binaries via apt rather than
>> install.packages(), which is all fine, but methods both have pros and
>> cons.
>
> Some people prefer having all their binaries *man
> On 10 Feb 2025, at 17:23, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> What we (ie Detlef, Inaki, myself) myself do for the distros is fundamentally
> different. Both are merits, both can coexist, but I like the added 'oomph'
> you get by integrating properly with the distribution you deploy on. Ubuntu
> i
On 10 February 2025 at 23:19, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> some people prefer installing binaries via apt rather than
> install.packages(), which is all fine, but methods both have pros and
> cons.
Some people prefer having all their binaries *managed* by apt/dnf, but
still using install.packages() to tri
On 10 February 2025 at 23:19, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
| The "naked binaries" are widely used, and therefore probably useful to
| many folks, me included. Some standardisation on paths would be
| incredibly useful, even if CRAN would not offer such binaries, other
| repositories could.
Sure, but naked
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 9:48 PM Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 11, 2025, at 5:23 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10 February 2025 at 07:35, Carl Boettiger wrote:
> > | Great discussion.
> > |
> > | Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
> > | p
> On Feb 11, 2025, at 5:23 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 10 February 2025 at 07:35, Carl Boettiger wrote:
> | Great discussion.
> |
> | Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
> | project also builds binaries for Linux (Ubuntu latest) https://
> |
>
>
>
> The proprietary Package Manager (PPM) from Posit (
> https://packagemanager.posit.co/client/#/) does offer binary packages for
> GNU/Linux, but the usage of this service is restricted in ways that go
> against the principles of open source (
> https://posit.co/about/posit-service-terms-of-u
On 10 February 2025 at 07:35, Carl Boettiger wrote:
| Great discussion.
|
| Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
| project also builds binaries for Linux (Ubuntu latest) https://
| docs.r-universe.dev/install/binaries.html (as well as other targets includi
Adding a different project to this discussion:
Recently at the R repository working group a project to provide them for
multiple distributions and toolchain was presented.
See the documentation about what do they (Patrick Schratz) share:
https://docs.r-package-binaries.devxy.io/index.html
The exi
Great discussion.
Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
project also builds binaries for Linux (Ubuntu latest)
https://docs.r-universe.dev/install/binaries.html (as well as other targets
including wasm). It also provides binaries for Bioconductor and packages
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 10 February 2025 at 11:00, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
> | Another argument to demonstrate the feasibility is the r2u project
> | (https://github.com/eddelbuettel/r2u). It offers CRAN as Ubuntu Binaries,
> but
> | in order to build these U
On 10 February 2025 at 11:00, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
| Another argument to demonstrate the feasibility is the r2u project
| (https://github.com/eddelbuettel/r2u). It offers CRAN as Ubuntu Binaries, but
| in order to build these Ubuntu Binaries it actually makes use of the binary R
| packages built
Hi Simon,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Urbanek"
> To: "Tobias Verbeke"
> Cc: "r-devel@r-project.org"
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 10:33:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] binary R packages for GNU/Linu
Tobias,
although we did discuss the possibility of extending the
os/toolchain/architecture notation for binary packages beyond macOS, Linux was
not necessarily on the list as Linux distributions have already established
ways of providing binaries, so it does not seem productive to duplicate the
16 matches
Mail list logo
