On 19/09/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Apparently FC6 will have different flags/ different default behaviour, at
> least for ld.
Just for reference I have tested the default CFLAGS in FC-5 and FC-6.
They are equal, namely:
CFLAGS="-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>
>> Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Thanks Prof. Ripley and Ei-Ji. I should have mentioned that all the
versions I reported for were self-compiled, and I did so with the same
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 14:23 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Thanks Prof. Ripley and Ei-Ji. I should have mentioned that all the
> > > versions I reported for were self-compiled, and I did so with the same
> > > set of flags as the FC5 rpm. Will
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Thanks Prof. Ripley and Ei-Ji. I should have mentioned that all the
>>> versions I reported for were self-compiled, and I did so with the same
>>> set of flags as the FC5 rpm. Will add that to the list
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks Prof. Ripley and Ei-Ji. I should have mentioned that all the
> > versions I reported for were self-compiled, and I did so with the same
> > set of flags as the FC5 rpm. Will add that to the list in my head of
> > things to report.
>
> (I th
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Gavin Simpson wrote:
n
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 08:26 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
I didn't have access to my FC5 boxes yesterday (electrical testing).
This does need the FC5-specific compilation options set
(-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ss
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 08:26 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I didn't have access to my FC5 boxes yesterday (electrical testing).
>
> This does need the FC5-specific compilation options set
> (-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4), so it is not surpri
I didn't have access to my FC5 boxes yesterday (electrical testing).
This does need the FC5-specific compilation options set
(-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4), so it is not surprising it is not
reproducible elsewhere (including under valgrind, BTW
This seems to be the mine which I contrived. m(_|_)m
--- R-alpha.orig/src/main/gram.y2006-09-04 23:41:33.0 +0900
+++ R-alpha/src/main/gram.y 2006-09-19 13:01:41.0 +0900
@@ -99,11 +99,12 @@
# endif
#endif
#include
+#define MB_BUF 16
static size_t ucstomb(char *s, w
Gavin Simpson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:02 +, Gregor Gorjanc wrote:
>> Gavin Simpson ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>>> Dear List
>>>
>>> I just noticed the following behaviour in R 2.3.1 Patched (2006-06-13
>>> r38342) and confirmed similar behaviour in R 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-18
>>> r39383) & R 2
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:02 +, Gregor Gorjanc wrote:
> Gavin Simpson ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> >
> > Dear List
> >
> > I just noticed the following behaviour in R 2.3.1 Patched (2006-06-13
> > r38342) and confirmed similar behaviour in R 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-18
> > r39383) & R 2.5.0 (2006-09-18 r
Gavin Simpson ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
> Dear List
>
> I just noticed the following behaviour in R 2.3.1 Patched (2006-06-13
> r38342) and confirmed similar behaviour in R 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-18
> r39383) & R 2.5.0 (2006-09-18 r39383) - which may actually be the same
> thing?, that trying to plot t
12 matches
Mail list logo
