On 09.06.2017 13:23, Martin Maechler wrote:
Kirill Müller
on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes:
> On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill Müller wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote:
Kirill Müller on
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0
> Kirill Müller
> on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes:
> On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill Müller wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote:
Kirill Müller on
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes:
>>> > Hi I've noted a m
On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill Müller wrote:
On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote:
Kirill Müller
on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes:
> Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation:
> Current R-exts reads
> s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS-
On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote:
Kirill Müller
on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes:
> Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation:
> Current R-exts reads
> s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx);
> but I believe it ha
> Kirill Müller
> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes:
> Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation:
> Current R-exts reads
> s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx);
> but I believe it has to be
> PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(s = eva