t; Martin
>
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Spencer
> >> Graves
> >> Sent: Friday, 08 January, 2021 13:04
> >> To: r-devel@r-project.org
>
> Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
> on Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:41:03 + writes:
>>> Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
>>> on Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:50:14 + writes:
>>
>> > Instead of a separate file to store such a list, would it be an idea
>> to add versions of the \h
>> Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
>> on Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:50:14 + writes:
>
>> Instead of a separate file to store such a list, would it be an idea
>to add versions of the \href{}{} and \url{} markup commands that are skipped
>by the URL checks?
>> Best,
>> Wolfgang
>
>I th
authors should get ways to skip
URL checking..
Martin
>> -Original Message-
>> From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Spencer
>> Graves
>> Sent: Friday, 08 January, 2021 13:04
>> To: r-devel@r-project.org
>> Su
gt;Graves
>Sent: Friday, 08 January, 2021 13:04
>To: r-devel@r-project.org
>Subject: Re: [Rd] URL checks
>
> I also would be pleased to be allowed to provide "a list of known
>false-positive/exceptions" to the URL tests. I've been challenged
>multiple times r
Is this a topic for Google Summer of Code? See
https://github.com/rstats-gsoc/gsoc2021/wiki
On 2021-01-09 12:34 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> The idea of 'white lists' to prevent known (and 'tolerated') issues, note,
> warnings, ... from needlessly reappearing is very powerful and general,
The idea of 'white lists' to prevent known (and 'tolerated') issues, note,
warnings, ... from needlessly reappearing is very powerful and general, and
can go much further than just URL checks.
I suggested several times in the past that we can look at the format Debian
uses in its 'lintian' packa
I also would be pleased to be allowed to provide "a list of known
false-positive/exceptions" to the URL tests. I've been challenged
multiple times regarding URLs that worked fine when I checked them. We
should not be required to do a partial lobotomy to pass R CMD check ;-)
Spe
I encountered the same issue today with https://astrostatistics.psu.edu/.
This is a trust chain issue, as explained here:
https://whatsmychaincert.com/?astrostatistics.psu.edu.
I've worked for a couple of years on a project to increase HTTPS
adoption on the web and we noticed that this type
One other failure mode: SSL certificates trusted by browsers that are
not installed on the check machine, e.g. the "GEANT Vereniging"
certificate from https://relational.fit.cvut.cz/ .
K
On 07.01.21 12:14, Kirill Müller via R-devel wrote:
Hi
The URL checks in R CMD check test all links in
10 matches
Mail list logo
