Re: [Rd] Suggestions for improving R-FAQ

2008-11-25 Thread hadley wickham
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Max Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hadley, > > These are good suggestions. > >> * Remove infrequently asked questions - e.g. 2.3, 2.4, 7.9, 7.11, >> 7.12, 7.15, 7.19, 7.23, 7.28 Maybe 7.28 should be titled: How can I make read.table (and read.csv and read.fwf))

Re: [Rd] Suggestions for improving R-FAQ

2008-11-25 Thread Max Kuhn
Hadley, These are good suggestions. > * Remove infrequently asked questions - e.g. 2.3, 2.4, 7.9, 7.11, > 7.12, 7.15, 7.19, 7.23, 7.28 I'd like to lobby to keep 7.23 and 7.28. I still get questions about those. Sampling bias might be an issue: we don't get questions (to r-help) for those becau

Re: [Rd] Suggestions for improving R-FAQ

2008-11-25 Thread hadley wickham
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:41 PM, hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently, if you were to print out the R frequently asked questions > (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html), it would be 132 pages > long. Is it any wonder that so many question could be answered by > looking a