Hi,
as said at the end, all comments are now in the light of R 3.x.0 (x > 0).
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13-02-15 1:53 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Duncan,
>>
>> thanks you for your prompt reply.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
On 13-02-15 1:53 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Hi Duncan,
thanks you for your prompt reply.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
There are several reasons I decided against that:
- two packages may request overlapping patterns, making it much messier to
do the matching, c
Hi Duncan,
thanks you for your prompt reply.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> There are several reasons I decided against that:
>
> - two packages may request overlapping patterns, making it much messier to
> do the matching, checking etc, since the matching would have
There are several reasons I decided against that:
- two packages may request overlapping patterns, making it much
messier to do the matching, checking etc, since the matching would have
to depend on the package being processed.
- one package may request a pattern that another package uses
