Sorry for late reply. I like the stop-on-error.
Thanks for merging.
Glad to be R contributor!
On 4 November 2016 at 09:42, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>>
>> > Dirk Eddelbuettel
>> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
>>
>> >
Thanks Martin.
These changes are great and improve the usefulness of 'R CMD check'.
Especially in the context of the Bioconductor daily builds where
we'll use --no-stop-on-test-error so developers will get a full
picture of all the errors in their package at once.
Cheers,
H.
To provide some con
> Hervé Pagès
> on Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:37:15 -0800 writes:
> On 11/05/2016 01:53 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>> Oliver Keyes
>>> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:42:54 -0400 writes:
>>
>> > On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
On 11/05/2016 01:53 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Oliver Keyes
on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:42:54 -0400 writes:
> On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>> > Dirk Eddelbuettel >
>> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
>>
>> > On 4 November 201
> Oliver Keyes
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:42:54 -0400 writes:
> On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>> > Dirk Eddelbuettel >
>> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
>>
>> > On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: |
On Friday, 4 November 2016, Martin Maechler
wrote:
> > Dirk Eddelbuettel >
> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
>
> > On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My
> > proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if |
> > somebody has a more con
> Dirk Eddelbuettel
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
> On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My
> proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if |
> somebody has a more concise or better "English style"
> wording | (which is somewhat
> Brian G Peterson
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:37:18 -0500 writes:
> On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 16:24 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> > Jan Gorecki > on Fri, 4
>> Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes:
>>
>> > Martin, I submitted very simple patch on >
>> https://bu
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 16:24 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > Jan Gorecki
> > on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes:
>
> > Martin, I submitted very simple patch on
> > https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176
>
> > Herve, While I like your idea, I pref
On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote:
| My proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if
| somebody has a more concise or better "English style" wording
| (which is somewhat compatible with all the other options you see
| from 'R CMD check --help'),
| please speak up.
Wh
> Jan Gorecki
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes:
> Martin, I submitted very simple patch on
> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176
> Herve, While I like your idea, I prefer to keep my patch
> simple, it is now exactly what Martin mentions
Martin,
I submitted very simple patch on
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176
Herve,
While I like your idea, I prefer to keep my patch simple, it is now
exactly what Martin mentions. I think it is a good start that can
eventually be extended later for what you are asking.
Reg
Hi Martin, Jan,
On 11/03/2016 03:45 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Jan Gorecki
on Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:51:28 + writes:
> Hello community/devs, Is there an option to run package
> tests during R CMD check and not stop on first error? I
> know that testing frameworks (testhat and
> Jan Gorecki
> on Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:51:28 + writes:
> Hello community/devs, Is there an option to run package
> tests during R CMD check and not stop on first error? I
> know that testing frameworks (testhat and others) can do
> that but asking about just R and b
14 matches
Mail list logo
