I repeat it for all the reason I gave to Duncan on a personal E-mail, It is
a lot of text, and I might be wrong, but I attach it in case it is useful:
A) I feel Version Control (SVN) is great when there is a little group of
people maintaining the code (RCore ~ 20); but Git could allow a bigger
gro
On 03/01/2018 6:11 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 26.12.2017 00:45, Juan Telleria wrote:
However, and hope not to be off-topic, a git repository (github, gitlab,
codeplex, etc., not just solely github) could constitute a tidy approach,
and make things easier to R Core :)
By putting the focus on ver
On 26.12.2017 00:45, Juan Telleria wrote:
However, and hope not to be off-topic, a git repository (github, gitlab,
codeplex, etc., not just solely github) could constitute a tidy approach,
and make things easier to R Core :)
By putting the focus on version control, the line of changes made wit
However, and hope not to be off-topic, a git repository (github, gitlab,
codeplex, etc., not just solely github) could constitute a tidy approach,
and make things easier to R Core :)
By putting the focus on version control, the line of changes made with each
commit (With the possibility to reverse
M... I see... thank you Suzen.
Juan
> I strongly disagree. Are you aware that github is a commercial
> company, github inc. [1] ?
> What about gitlab? or Microsoft's codeplex? There are other services
> similar to github, why github?
> What happens if github goes out of business?
>
> R-proje
On 26 December 2017 at 00:00, Juan Telleria wrote:
> Maybe I'm new, and forgive my ignorance, but maybe in the future (~ X years
> from now) the R Project could be managed entirely from github, by doing
I strongly disagree. Are you aware that github is a commercial
company, github inc. [1] ?
What
Maybe I'm new, and forgive my ignorance, but maybe in the future (~ X years
from now) the R Project could be managed entirely from github, by doing
pull requests and only R Core having commit rights...
Would make the forking process also easier... And could be a good roadmap.
But we're not using
On 25/12/2017 7:00 AM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
2017-12-25 12:30 GMT+01:00 Duncan Murdoch :
The one negative aspect of Winston's effort is caused by this weakness. If
you tell me that something happened in revision 73909, I know it was recent.
If you tell me that something appeared in commit 2e80059, i
2017-12-25 12:30 GMT+01:00 Duncan Murdoch :
> The one negative aspect of Winston's effort is caused by this weakness. If
> you tell me that something happened in revision 73909, I know it was recent.
> If you tell me that something appeared in commit 2e80059, it wastes my time
> looking up that com
On 22/12/2017 10:46 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi,
See inline below.
On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch
on Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:23:13 -0500 writes:
On 21/12/2017 1:02 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a
WARNING whe
Hi,
See inline below.
> On Dec 22, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>
>> Duncan Murdoch
>>on Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:23:13 -0500 writes:
>
>> On 21/12/2017 1:02 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
> On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a
> WARNING when some compiler
> Duncan Murdoch
> on Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:23:13 -0500 writes:
> On 21/12/2017 1:02 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a
WARNING when some compiler warning flags are detected,
such as -Werror, because they are non-port
On 12/21/2017 01:02 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
compiler warning flags are detected, such as -Werror, because they are
non-portable. This appears to have been added in this commit:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/2e80059
On 21/12/2017 1:02 PM, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
compiler warning flags are detected, such as -Werror, because they are
non-portable. This appears to have been added in this commit:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/2e80059
>> On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
>> compiler warning flags are detected, such as -Werror, because they are
>> non-portable. This appears to have been added in this commit:
>>https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/2e80059
>
> That is not the canonical R sourc
On 20/12/2017 6:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 20/12/2017 5:48 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
On 20/12/2017 17:42, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
compiler warning flags are detected
On 20/12/2017 5:48 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
On 20/12/2017 17:42, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
compiler warning flags are detected, such as -Werror, because they are
non-portab
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> On 20/12/2017 17:42, Winston Chang wrote:
>>
>> On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
>> compiler warning flags are detected, such as -Werror, because they are
>> non-portable. This appears to have been added
On 20/12/2017 17:42, Winston Chang wrote:
On recent builds of R-devel, R CMD check gives a WARNING when some
compiler warning flags are detected, such as -Werror, because they are
non-portable. This appears to have been added in this commit:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/2e80059
Tha
19 matches
Mail list logo
