Re: [Rd] R-2.6.0 package check problems

2007-10-09 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Robin Hankin wrote: >> >> thanks everyone. My problems were solved by following Peter D's >> (offline) suggestion... > That (offline) must have been unintentional. I usually try to keep > discussions on the list, unless there is very good reason not to

Re: [Rd] R-2.6.0 package check problems

2007-10-09 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Robin Hankin wrote: > > thanks everyone. My problems were solved by following Peter D's > (offline) suggestion... That (offline) must have been unintentional. I usually try to keep discussions on the list, unless there is very good reason not to. In this particular case I was clearly speculating

Re: [Rd] R-2.6.0 package check problems

2007-10-09 Thread Robin Hankin
On 5 Oct 2007, at 15:47, Robin Hankin wrote: > Hello > > > One of my packages, untb_1.3-2, passes R CMD check under > MacOSX (and apparently the systems used in the package check > summary page on CRAN) but fails with the following message on > R-2.6.0.tgz compiled last night on my (home) linux b

Re: [Rd] R-2.6.0 package check problems

2007-10-05 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
Robin Hankin wrote: > Hello > > > One of my packages, untb_1.3-2, passes R CMD check under > MacOSX (and apparently the systems used in the package check > summary page on CRAN) but fails with the following message on > R-2.6.0.tgz compiled last night on my (home) linux box. I hasten > to

Re: [Rd] R-2.6.0 package check problems

2007-10-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
Robin Hankin wrote: > Hello > > > One of my packages, untb_1.3-2, passes R CMD check under > MacOSX (and apparently the systems used in the package check > summary page on CRAN) but fails with the following message on > R-2.6.0.tgz compiled last night on my (home) linux box. I hasten > to add