Thanks, Jeff, good catch. Now committed.
Simon
On Sep 29, 2009, at 18:27 , Jeff Horner wrote:
Simon Urbanek wrote:
[...]
I don't have konqueror at hand, so I have tested and fixed the lynx
case (lynx is acting as an HTTP/1.0 client and expects non-
persistent connection). With some luck the
On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Jeff Horner wrote:
> Simon Urbanek wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I don't have konqueror at hand, so I have tested and fixed the lynx case
> > (lynx is acting as an HTTP/1.0 client and expects non-persistent
> > connection). With some luck the fix may solve the konqueror issu
Simon Urbanek wrote:
[...]
I don't have konqueror at hand, so I have tested and fixed the lynx case
(lynx is acting as an HTTP/1.0 client and expects non-persistent
connection). With some luck the fix may solve the konqueror issue as
well (although I'd be a bit surprised if konqueror was not 1.
Thomas,
On Sep 29, 2009, at 15:15 , Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
Hello,
sorry to provide only very little testing, but with the release date
nearing, I thought it better to report this quickly than to wait for
an uncertain period until I find more time.
Yes, good thinking :).
I'm ob
