Duncan,
When
The generic solve method has "(a, b, ...)"
I have "solve.gchol(a, b, full=TRUE, ...)"
I was assuming that I would still get an error from CMD check. These are the
ones that I argued as "unavoidable".
But... I just checked, and none of those were the squawkers, only t
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 3/9/2009 11:29 AM, Terry Therneau wrote:
2. R CMD check gives dozens of warnings ...
Yes, I see a lot of warnings too, but I think that they can and
should be ignored.
1. There is a set where the generic function has "..." and my
realization of the generic has a
On 3/9/2009 11:29 AM, Terry Therneau wrote:
2. R CMD check gives dozens of warnings ...
Yes, I see a lot of warnings too, but I think that they can and should be
ignored.
1. There is a set where the generic function has "..." and my realization of
the generic has a named argument. But thi
> 2. R CMD check gives dozens of warnings ...
Yes, I see a lot of warnings too, but I think that they can and should be
ignored.
1. There is a set where the generic function has "..." and my realization of
the generic has a named argument. But this is exactly what the ... is for in a
generi
Terry,
1. R CMD build on your package reports at least two warnings for me.
2. R CMD check gives dozens of warnings even before the test cases where
it already stops in gtest.R rather than anaything called gchol2.R.
3. There is no tests/gchol2.R !!!
Perhaps you want to clean up some other i
