Re: [Rd] PR#9295

2006-10-16 Thread Daniel Platt
To Daniel Platt/Watson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: [Rd] PR#9295 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I asked a question that might help me track down what changed between > 2.3.1 that did build and the 2.4.0 version that will not build. Some of

Re: [Rd] PR#9295

2006-10-16 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I asked a question that might help me track down what changed between > 2.3.1 that did build and the 2.4.0 version that will not build. Some of > the undefined names the linker was complaining about looked like #define > symbols that were not picked up by configure.