Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-12 Thread Avraham Adler
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 09/01/2015 10:56 AM, Henric Winell wrote: >> On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> >>> On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > This version includes o

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-09 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 09/01/2015 10:56 AM, Henric Winell wrote: > On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >> On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch >>> wrote: This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer t

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-09 Thread Henric Winell
On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before th

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-08 Thread Avraham Adler
2014-December/070286.html >>>https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2014-December/070319.html >>> >>> >>>Many thanks to you and others for looking into this, >>>Henric >>> >>> >>> >>>> I then downgraded to GCC

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-08 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
failure issue due to the extra 0 in scientific notation [7]. >>> >>> It does not matter if I do the entire process in the MSYS2 >>> environment, or if I do in in Windows with msys\usr\bin in my path. >>> >>> Naïvely, it seems that if there were some wha

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-08 Thread Avraham Adler
of snprintf and vsprintf in >>> that file to "override" the standard, perhaps this method would work. >>> Of course, running make check-all may uncover more issues. I intend to >>> run the equivalent checks (from the tools library) inside of R with >>> ki

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-08 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
ng else is problematic. >> >> Hopefully, something in this description resonates with one of the >> readers here. If anyone has any ideas as to how to circumvent the >> issues with compat.c, I'd be very grateful. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Avi

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-08 Thread Henric Winell
/r-devel/2015-January/070354.html Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:31:07 -0500 From: Duncan Murdoch To: Jeroen Ooms Cc: "R-devel@r-project.org" Subject: Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows Message-ID: <54ab.4020...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 0

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-08 Thread Avraham Adler
ps://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html [6] http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win64/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/4.8.4/threads-win32/seh/x86_64-4.8.4-release-win32-seh-rt_v3-rev0.7z/download [7] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2015-January/070354.html

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch > wrote: >> >> This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last >> summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before >> the R 3.2.0 release, but this now

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-07 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last > summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before > the R 3.2.0 release, but this now looks unlikely, unless someone else with > experi