On 5/13/07, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007, hadley wickham wrote:
>
> >> First, it was not clear that you are talking about the output of
> >> traceback(), which is _a representation of_ the call stack and depends on
> >> the details of deparsing.
> >
> > Given t
On Sun, 13 May 2007, hadley wickham wrote:
>> First, it was not clear that you are talking about the output of
>> traceback(), which is _a representation of_ the call stack and depends on
>> the details of deparsing.
>
> Given that there is a substantial delay in one case, and not in the
> other,
> First, it was not clear that you are talking about the output of
> traceback(), which is _a representation of_ the call stack and depends on
> the details of deparsing.
Given that there is a substantial delay in one case, and not in the
other, I had assumed (perhaps falsely) that there was somet
First, it was not clear that you are talking about the output of
traceback(), which is _a representation of_ the call stack and depends on
the details of deparsing.
Second, the difference is I believe not implicit vs explicit printing, but
of printing an evaluated object vs printing a call. Wh
I can't reproduce that with ggplot 0.4-0 as some of the functions you are
using do not appear to be part of ggplot (I suspect you are using a newer
version of ggplot than you have released) but the following illustrates
the difference using "R version 2.5.0 Patched (2007-05-01 r41405)"
and lattice
