of Romain Francois [rom...@r-enthusiasts.com]
Sent: 31 March 2014 08:22
To: Martin Morgan
Cc: R-devel
Subject: Re: [Rd] CXX_STD and configure.ac in packages
Hi,
My advice would be to use SystemRequirements: C++11
As is definitely a part of C++11, assuming this version of the
standard gives it
n available. But from
>> a global perspective you should think of
>> C++98 and C++11 as two different languages.
>>
>> Martyn
>>
>>
>> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on
>> behalf of
om...@r-enthusiasts.com]
> Sent: 31 March 2014 08:22
> To: Martin Morgan
> Cc: R-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] CXX_STD and configure.ac in packages
>
> Hi,
>
> My advice would be to use SystemRequirements: C++11
>
> As is definitely a part of C++11, assuming this version of
11 as two different languages.
Martyn
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf
of Romain Francois [rom...@r-enthusiasts.com]
Sent: 31 March 2014 08:22
To: Martin Morgan
Cc: R-devel
Subject: Re: [Rd] CXX_STD and configu
Hi,
My advice would be to use SystemRequirements: C++11
As is definitely a part of C++11, assuming this version of the
standard gives it to you. Your package may not compile on platforms where a
C++11 compiler is not available, but perhaps if this becomes a pattern, then
such compilers will
Hi Martin,
On 30 March 2014 at 12:50, Martin Morgan wrote:
| In C++ code for use in a R-3.1.0 package, my specific problem is that I would
| like to use if it is available, or if
not,
| or if all else fails.
This non-standardization over the last decade caused a lot of headaches.
We do
