Thanks. I should not try adjusting code after some hours of proofreading.
Making that change gave a suitable time difference.
Best, JN
On 13-11-03 03:46 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> tfor <- cmpfun(tfor)
> twhile <- cmpfun(twhile)
>
> /Henrik
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Prof J C
tfor <- cmpfun(tfor)
twhile <- cmpfun(twhile)
/Henrik
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Prof J C Nash (U30A) wrote:
> My bad to not give details. I'm comparing (though not quite directly) to
> results in the posting
> http://rwiki.sciviews.org/doku.php?id=tips:rqcasestudy.
>
> What prompted the
My bad to not give details. I'm comparing (though not quite directly) to
results in the posting
http://rwiki.sciviews.org/doku.php?id=tips:rqcasestudy.
What prompted the query was a write up of "for" versus "while" loops,
where there was a speedup using compiler for one of these. I had the
example
On 13-11-03 2:15 PM, Prof J C Nash (U30A) wrote:
I had a bunch of examples of byte code compiles in something I was
writing. Changed to 3.0.2 and the advantage of compiler disappears. I've
looked in the NEWS file but do not see anything that suggests that the
compile is now built-in. Possibly I'v
