Re: [Rd] Building packages

2007-12-07 Thread hadley wickham
On 12/7/07, Barry Rowlingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > An svn checkout directory can contain a mix of files that > > are mirrored in the svn and not mirrored. In particular, if you > > add a new file into your checkout directory it will not automatically > > go int

Re: [Rd] Building packages

2007-12-07 Thread Barry Rowlingson
Oleg Sklyar wrote: > If I am not mistaken R CMD build builds the package temporarily and uses > that build to build the vignette, so where is the problem? All my > vignettes build fine on both Linux and Windows and on Windows you > actually see that running R CMD build --binary builds the source c

Re: [Rd] Building packages

2007-12-07 Thread Oleg Sklyar
These files in the SVN tree does not harm the things that are checked in. However it is indeed reasonable to keep the rubbish out, so: > I've started a new package and I'm trying to work out the best way to do > it. I'm managing my package source directory with SVN, but "R CMD build" > likes to

Re: [Rd] Building packages

2007-12-07 Thread Barry Rowlingson
Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > An svn checkout directory can contain a mix of files that > are mirrored in the svn and not mirrored. In particular, if you > add a new file into your checkout directory it will not automatically > go into the repository on your next commit unless you specifically > pla

Re: [Rd] Building packages

2007-12-07 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
An svn checkout directory can contain a mix of files that are mirrored in the svn and not mirrored. In particular, if you add a new file into your checkout directory it will not automatically go into the repository on your next commit unless you specifically place that file under svn control so ju

Re: [Rd] Building packages on Windows fails

2005-10-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Peter Kleiweg wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley schreef op de 7e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: > > >>On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: >> >> >>>Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: >>> >>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: >Wha

Re: [Rd] Building packages on Windows fails

2005-10-07 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley schreef op de 7e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: > >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: >> >>> Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: >>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:

Re: [Rd] Building packages on Windows fails

2005-10-07 Thread Peter Kleiweg
Prof Brian Ripley schreef op de 7e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: > > > Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: > > > > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: > > > > > > > What has changed in R for Windows

Re: [Rd] Building packages on Windows fails

2005-10-07 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: > Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: > >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: >> >>> >>> What has changed in R for Windows from version 1.7.1 to >>> 2.2.0 that won't allow me to build binary packages? >> >> Many thi

Re: [Rd] Building packages on Windows fails

2005-10-07 Thread Peter Kleiweg
Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: > > > > > What has changed in R for Windows from version 1.7.1 to > > 2.2.0 that won't allow me to build binary packages? > > Many things have changed; I don't know which is causin

Re: [Rd] Building packages on Windows fails

2005-10-06 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote: > > What has changed in R for Windows from version 1.7.1 to > 2.2.0 that won't allow me to build binary packages? Many things have changed; I don't know which is causing the failure you see. One change is that instructions are now collected in the Ins