Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/18/2009 6:20 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: Under R2.10.0 beta (2009-10-14 r50082) my .First does not run reliably. I reported this last week, but not reproducibly, and it seemed to go away, so I thought it might be installation-related. But it has now recurred reproducibly, at leas

Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-20 Thread luke
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 10/18/2009 6:58 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: I started the same version of R in my usual starting directory (where there's a larger .RData, whose .First is running OK right now) and then did save( .First, file=<>) I'm not sure exactly wher

Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-19 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/18/2009 6:58 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: I started the same version of R in my usual starting directory (where there's a larger .RData, whose .First is running OK right now) and then did save( .First, file=<>) I'm not sure exactly where the .First came from before that; I use a c

Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-18 Thread Mark.Bravington
I started the same version of R in my usual starting directory (where there's a larger .RData, whose .First is running OK right now) and then did save( .First, file=<>) I'm not sure exactly where the .First came from before that; I use a couple of different machines and (in the runup to 2.10) a

Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 18/10/2009 6:20 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: Under R2.10.0 beta (2009-10-14 r50082) my .First does not run reliably. I reported this last week, but not reproducibly, and it seemed to go away, so I thought it might be installation-related. But it has now recurred reproducibly, at leas