> actually, it might not be a bad idea to require a unique
> bug-entry interface -- actually we have been thinking of moving
> to bugzilla -- if only Peter Dalgaard could find a smart enough
> person (even to be paid) who'd port all the old bug reports into the
> new format..
If you haven't alread
Martin, you're very welcome.
> A general point about your suggestions: You seem to assume that
> bug reports are typically entered via the R-bugs web interface
Yes, that was the premiss of my suggestions. Perhaps to supplement
these ideas, bug.report() could be rewritten to prompt useful
info
Thanks a lot,
Andrew, for your input!
A general point about your suggestions: You seem to assume that
bug reports are typically entered via the R-bugs web interface
(which is down at the moment and for a few more dozen hours probably},
rather than via R's builtin bug.report() function or the
s
My most common problem with the bug reporting system
is distinguishing between bugs and my own stupidity
or confusion. So I post to the r-devel list to ask;
even when there is a response, I may then
fail to get around to submitting the bug report itself ...
I know R-core doesn't want the bug l
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
> >
> >>[Mainly for R-foundation members; but kept in public for general
> >> brainstorming...]
> >>
> >
> >[SNIP]
> >
> >2) Try to use the structure of the re
Andrew Robinson wrote:
>Hi Martin,
>
>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
>
>>[Mainly for R-foundation members; but kept in public for general
>> brainstorming...]
>>
>>
>
>I'll take up the invitation to brainstorm.
>
>As a user of R for a number of years, I'd
