> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:41:04 +,
> Michael Hoffman (MH) wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> I put together a clunky way to handle that for a presentation last week;
>> it may be enough for you.
>>
>> I leave the Sweave options at their defaults, but I have code chunks
>>
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I put together a clunky way to handle that for a presentation last week;
> it may be enough for you.
>
> I leave the Sweave options at their defaults, but I have code chunks
> that affect the appearance, and I run those without echoing to switch
> between a couple of fo
Michael Hoffman wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>
>> On 01/12/2007 2:38 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>> Dieter Menne wrote:
>>>
Michael Hoffman sneakemail.com> writes:
> I would like to be able to do something like this:
>
><>=
>...
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 01/12/2007 2:38 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
>> Dieter Menne wrote:
>>> Michael Hoffman sneakemail.com> writes:
>>>
I would like to be able to do something like this:
<>=
...
@
with mywidth set in a previous code chunk. Is there
On Dec 1, 2007 3:56 PM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding is that Michael wants to have the Sweave options in a
> chunk depend on a calculation happening in the underlying R session.
> This is hard to do with hooks, because they are run after the options
> have already b
I've moved this response to R-devel, because my contribution is more
along those lines. Michael, if this doesn't interest you, please let us
know.
On 01/12/2007 2:38 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
> Dieter Menne wrote:
>> Michael Hoffman sneakemail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I would like to be able to do
