should appear at an R-devel near you...
thanks Seth
Seth Falcon wrote:
> Robert Gentleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, that suggests setting at the options level would solve both of your
>> problems and that seems like the best approach. I don't really want to
>> pass this around as a par
Robert Gentleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, that suggests setting at the options level would solve both of your
> problems and that seems like the best approach. I don't really want to
> pass this around as a parameter through the maze of functions that might
> actually download something
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I also thought that there was no need for this level of complexity.
> (BTW, some of the patch is changes Seth has made for other purposes, e.g.
> that to memory.c, so please no one apply all of it.)
*blush* sorry about that. I made the final diff
OK, that suggests setting at the options level would solve both of your
problems and that seems like the best approach. I don't really want to
pass this around as a parameter through the maze of functions that might
actually download something if we don't have to.
I think we can provide somethi
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Robert Gentleman wrote:
>
>> I wonder if it would not be better to make the user agent string
>> something that is configurable (at the time R is built) rather than at
>> run time. This would make Seth's patch about 1% as long. Or this could
>>
On 7/28/06, Robert Gentleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if it would not be better to make the user agent string
> something that is configurable (at the time R is built) rather than at
> run time. This would make Seth's patch about 1% as long. Or this could
> be handled as an option. The
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Robert Gentleman wrote:
> I wonder if it would not be better to make the user agent string
> something that is configurable (at the time R is built) rather than at
> run time. This would make Seth's patch about 1% as long. Or this could
> be handled as an option. The patche
I wonder if it would not be better to make the user agent string
something that is configurable (at the time R is built) rather than at
run time. This would make Seth's patch about 1% as long. Or this could
be handled as an option. The patches are pretty extensive and allow for
setting the agen
On 7/28/06, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a rough draft patch, see below, that adds a User-Agent header
> to HTTP requests made in R via download.file. If there is interest, I
> will polish it.
It looks right, but I am running under Windows without a compiler.
--
James P. How
[moved from R-help to R-devel]
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otherwise, see ?download.file and choose a different download method,
> or look at the source code (src/modules/internet/nanohttp.c) and submit a
> patch.
I have a rough draft patch, see below, that adds a User-Agent
10 matches
Mail list logo
