Hi Duncan,
Thanks a lot for eventually implementing this and making the Rd world
greener! https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/ff3ea81ae87
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Web: http://yihui.name
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13-10-09 4:34 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
>>
>> +
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13-10-12 6:49 PM, R. Michael Weylandt wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2013, at 21:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> On 13-10-09 7:54 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On my related wishlist: A standardized mechanism to 'R CMD
On 13-10-12 6:49 PM, R. Michael Weylandt wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 21:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-10-09 7:54 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On my related wishlist: A standardized mechanism to 'R CMD build' for
building man/*.Rd from any input format (e.g. roxygen and so on)
analogously
On Oct 9, 2013, at 21:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13-10-09 7:54 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On my related wishlist: A standardized mechanism to 'R CMD build' for
>> building man/*.Rd from any input format (e.g. roxygen and so on)
>> analogously how we can now build vignettes of an
On 13-10-09 7:54 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
I mean, it sounds like a better idea to define \CRANpkg only once in
one central place, and use it in base R, instead of defining it in
every single Rd file, because it seems to be generally useful (is
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
> I mean, it sounds like a better idea to define \CRANpkg only once in
> one central place, and use it in base R, instead of defining it in
> every single Rd file, because it seems to be generally useful (is 91 a
> large number? maybe).
>
> Similarl
I mean, it sounds like a better idea to define \CRANpkg only once in
one central place, and use it in base R, instead of defining it in
every single Rd file, because it seems to be generally useful (is 91 a
large number? maybe).
Similarly, when it comes to an add-on package, it will be nice if the
On 13-10-09 4:34 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
+1. As an example, there are 91 instances of \newcommand{\CRANpkg} in
R source, and this number is still growing as I see:
$ grep "newcommand{CRANpkg}" -r . | wc
91 91 10317
So you're saying if I ever get around to doing this, I'll ha
+1. As an example, there are 91 instances of \newcommand{\CRANpkg} in
R source, and this number is still growing as I see:
$ grep "newcommand{CRANpkg}" -r . | wc
91 91 10317
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
221
R-exts, in "2.13 User-defined macros", discusses user-defined macros. Is
it possible to have macros defined in one file, be used by another (within
a package)? This would increase the usefulness substantially, IMHO.
Best,
Kasper
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
10 matches
Mail list logo