Re: [Rd] update.packages(1)

2010-03-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 27/03/2010 4:48 PM, Seth Falcon wrote: On 3/27/10 1:43 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 25/03/2010 3:16 PM, Arni Magnusson wrote: I'm relaying a question from my institute's sysadmin: Would it be possible to modify update.packages() and related functions so that 'lib.loc' accepts integer values

Re: [Rd] update.packages(1)

2010-03-27 Thread Seth Falcon
On 3/27/10 1:43 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 25/03/2010 3:16 PM, Arni Magnusson wrote: >> I'm relaying a question from my institute's sysadmin: >> >> Would it be possible to modify update.packages() and related functions >> so that 'lib.loc' accepts integer values to specify a library from the >>

Re: [Rd] update.packages(1)

2010-03-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 25/03/2010 3:16 PM, Arni Magnusson wrote: I'm relaying a question from my institute's sysadmin: Would it be possible to modify update.packages() and related functions so that 'lib.loc' accepts integer values to specify a library from the .libPaths() vector? Many Linux users want to update

[Rd] update.packages(1)

2010-03-25 Thread Arni Magnusson
I'm relaying a question from my institute's sysadmin: Would it be possible to modify update.packages() and related functions so that 'lib.loc' accepts integer values to specify a library from the .libPaths() vector? Many Linux users want to update all user packages (inside the R_LIBS_USER di