> Rui Barradas writes:
Thanks: both fixed now in the trunk with c79004.
Best
-k
> Hello,
> R 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 20.04, sessionInfo() below.
> I believe there are two typos in ?file.path, section Value, 2nd paragraph.
> 1. There is a close parenthesis missing after Encoding, as it is
> readi
Hello,
R 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 20.04, sessionInfo() below.
I believe there are two typos in ?file.path, section Value, 2nd paragraph.
1. There is a close parenthesis missing after Encoding, as it is
reading is a bit confusing, I had to backtrack and repeat.
2. I'm not a native language speaker but
Thanks, fixed in R-devel and R-patched.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 22.12.2017 15:28, Korpela Mikko (MML) wrote:
I found three little typos in the ?regex manual. Apologies for the lack of a
diff, as the utility is not (yet) installed on this machine.
1. "There is a also" should probably be "There is
I found three little typos in the ?regex manual. Apologies for the lack of a
diff, as the utility is not (yet) installed on this machine.
1. "There is a also" should probably be "There is also".
2. In the list of functions following "This section covers the regular
expressions"..., "grep" appear
> Mikko Korpela
> on Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:16:49 +0200 writes:
> I found some trivial typos, mostly unmatched parentheses, in the R
> manuals. More information and suggested fixes are in the attached diff
file.
Thank you very much!
They have been applied to the R-devel and R-pa
I found some trivial typos, mostly unmatched parentheses, in the R
manuals. More information and suggested fixes are in the attached diff file.
--
Mikko Korpela
Department of Geosciences and Geography
University of Helsinki
Index: doc/manual/R-admin.texi
Hi,
Here are the issues I found:
Typos
-
(a) Found: It a parallel version of ‘evalq’,
"is" missing.
(b) Found: 'parLapplyLB', 'parSapplyLB' are load-balancing versions,
intended for use when applying ‘FUN’ to
'parLapplyLB' has no 'FUN' arg (more on this below).
(c) Found: 'c
Marc Schwartz me.com> writes:
>
[snip]
> See ?pdf and read through the "Note" section.
>
While I was reading this I noticed two minor typos
in pdf.Rd.
These patches are against the latest SVN devel version.
*** pdf.Rd.orig 2009-11-05 14:37:44.0 -0500
--- pdf.Rd 2009-11-0
> "LB" == Luca Braglia
> on Sat, 16 May 2009 22:46:39 +0200 writes:
LB> Hi few typos i've found
Thank you, Luca,
I've fixed all of them {and also moved your "juvenile" :-) bug
report to "*-fulfilled"}.
Regards,
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
LB> ?.C
LB> Specifying 'ENCOD
Hi
few typos i've found
?.C
Specifying 'ENCODING' overrrides any declared encodings (see
'link{Encoding}')
\link{Encoding}
writing R extensions, pag 73 (pdf version), note 1,
and we provided an emulation on Windows 2000): see ?dyn.oad
> If you are going to impose the cost on the developers of a bug report on
> typos, please at least do as we _do_ ask and check the current version, in
> your case at
>
> https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/tcltk/man/TclInterface.Rd
>
> You will I believe want to update your b
If you are going to impose the cost on the developers of a bug report on
typos, please at least do as we _do_ ask and check the current version, in
your case at
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/tcltk/man/TclInterface.Rd
You will I believe want to update your bug report.
On Tue, 2
Some typos in TclInferface.Rd
line 192: SIDE
\code{tclvalue} function, which can also occur on the left SIE of
line 199: INITIALIZES
\code{tclArray} creates a new Tcl array and INITALIZES it to the empty
line 221: DISTINCTION
argument; there are cases where the DISTICTION matters to Tcl,
* On Wed 07:19AM, 19 Apr 2006, Prof Brian Ripley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> By `documentation' do you mean `comments in the file'? If so, this is too
> minor to change whilst R 2.3.0 is in code freeze, but has been changed for
> R-devel.
Yes, I am referring to the comments in the file src/mai
By `documentation' do you mean `comments in the file'? If so, this is too
minor to change whilst R 2.3.0 is in code freeze, but has been changed for
R-devel.
If not, please can we have a more precise indication of where you are
refering to?
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In
In src/main/gram.y, the documentation for R_ParseVector has a wrong
signature:
SEXP R_ParseVector(TextBuffer *text, int n, ParseStatus *status)
should be
SEXP R_ParseVector(SEXP text, int n, ParseStatus *status)
In addition, the two occurrences of "IOBuffer" in the documentation
should be repla
Fixed now, thanks.
BTW, supplying patches inline almost always does not work as lines get
wrapped, tabs converted A text attachment should be better.
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Stephen D. Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The diffs below are based on revision 37445 and show
> some typo corrections fo
Hello,
The diffs below are based on revision 37445 and show
some typo corrections for writeLines.Rd, readLines.Rd,
and data.matrix.Rd that I'd like to bring to the list's
attention.
Sincerely,
Stephen Weigand
Rochester, Minnesota, USA
--- ./src/library/base/man/writeLines.RdSun Feb 26
18 matches
Mail list logo
