Re: [Rd] transform

2024-09-08 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Suggest you look at dplyr::mutate as this functionality is widely used there and has shown itself to be useful. On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 9:16 AM Sebastian Meyer wrote: > > Am 27.08.24 um 11:55 schrieb peter dalgaard: > > Yes. A quirk, rather than a bug I'd say. One issue is that the internal > >

Re: [Rd] transform

2024-08-27 Thread Sebastian Meyer
Am 27.08.24 um 11:55 schrieb peter dalgaard: Yes. A quirk, rather than a bug I'd say. One issue is that the internal logic of transform() relies on e <- eval(substitute(list(...)), `_data`, parent.frame()) tags <- names(e) so untagged entries in ... will not be included. ... unless

Re: [Rd] transform

2024-08-27 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
It could be enhanced to handle data frame argos. Unnamed args are currently just ignored so adding such would be backwards compatible. Any interest in this? On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:55 AM peter dalgaard wrote: > > Yes. A quirk, rather than a bug I'd say. One issue is that the internal logic >

Re: [Rd] transform

2024-08-27 Thread peter dalgaard
Yes. A quirk, rather than a bug I'd say. One issue is that the internal logic of transform() relies on e <- eval(substitute(list(...)), `_data`, parent.frame()) tags <- names(e) so untagged entries in ... will not be included. The other part is a direct consequence of a quirk in data.fr

[Rd] transform

2024-08-24 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
One oddity in transform that I recently noticed. It seems that to include a one-column data frame in the arguments one must name it even though the name is ignored. If the data frame has more than one column then it must also be named but in that case it is not ignored and the names are made up o

Re: [Rd] transform argument on 2.3 rc 2006-04-20

2006-04-24 Thread ernesto
Kurt Hornik wrote: >>ernesto writes: >> >> > > > >>Hi, >> >> > > > >>I'm adjusting package FLCore to the new R version and I got an error >>due to the change of the transform function argument "x" to >>"_data". Was this intentional ? >> >> > >You mean that you

Re: [Rd] transform argument on 2.3 rc 2006-04-20

2006-04-24 Thread Kurt Hornik
> ernesto writes: > Hi, > I'm adjusting package FLCore to the new R version and I got an error > due to the change of the transform function argument "x" to > "_data". Was this intentional ? You mean that you get the error? :-) See NEWS: o The data frame argument to transform() is n

[Rd] transform argument on 2.3 rc 2006-04-20

2006-04-24 Thread ernesto
Hi, I'm adjusting package FLCore to the new R version and I got an error due to the change of the transform function argument "x" to "_data". Was this intentional ? Regards EJ __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo