Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-23 Thread Claudia Beleites
I use svUnit, too. I put a kind of standard skeleton into my packages that has a packagename.unittest () function that will run all svUnit tests (if svUnit is available). This function returns NA if svUnit is not available, invisible (TRUE) if all tests are passed and stops otherwise. Which will

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-18 Thread Cook, Malcolm
svUnit - is Runit compatible and provides some IDE integration and report generation and easy syntax for defining tests. I find it works a treat, and fits very nicely with my R coding/packaging style (which also uses inlinedocs for easy package creation). --Malcolm Cook On 5/17/12 9:10 AM, "Wh

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 17.05.2012 17:56, Matthew Dowle wrote: Uwe Ligges statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes: On 17.05.2012 16:52, Brian G. Peterson wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:32 +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote: Yes: R CMD check does the trick. See Writing R Extension and read about a package's test directory. I p

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-17 Thread Matthew Dowle
Uwe Ligges statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes: > > On 17.05.2012 16:52, Brian G. Peterson wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:32 +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote: > >> Yes: R CMD check does the trick. See Writing R Extension and read > >> about a package's test directory. I prefer frameworks that do not > >

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 17.05.2012 16:52, Brian G. Peterson wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:32 +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote: Yes: R CMD check does the trick. See Writing R Extension and read about a package's test directory. I prefer frameworks that do not obfuscate failing test results on the CRAN check farm (as most

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-17 Thread Brian G. Peterson
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:32 +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote: > Yes: R CMD check does the trick. See Writing R Extension and read > about a package's test directory. I prefer frameworks that do not > obfuscate failing test results on the CRAN check farm (as most other > frameworks I have seen). Uwe: I don

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 17.05.2012 16:10, Whit Armstrong wrote: Can anyone share some opinions on test suites for R packages? I'm looking at testthat and RUnit. Does anyone have strong opinions on either of those. Any additional packages I should consider? Yes: R CMD check does the trick. See Writing R Extensio

[Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-17 Thread Whit Armstrong
Can anyone share some opinions on test suites for R packages? I'm looking at testthat and RUnit. Does anyone have strong opinions on either of those. Any additional packages I should consider? Thanks, Whit __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https:/