Maybe I need to add a comment.
The idea is not to avoid providing documentation for specific methods,
rather to be able to selectively hide things in the index keeping the
index sane. On the developer discretion, as generally I think the
developer should decide what the user can see and how.
It w
On 8/30/07, James W. MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Oleg makes a good point here, and I don't see how his suggestion
> would hide any documentation.
>
> As an example, start R and then open the HTML help page, and go to the
> Category package. If you click on any one of
>
> annotati
I think Oleg makes a good point here, and I don't see how his suggestion
would hide any documentation.
As an example, start R and then open the HTML help page, and go to the
Category package. If you click on any one of
annotation,GOHyperGParams-method
categoryName,GOHyperGParams-method
conditio
Hi Oleg --
On the usefulness of write.image,Image,character-method, in the end I
really want documentation on specific methods. Maybe the issue is one
of presentation?
write.image
Image,character-method
Image,missing-method
or, in a little more dynamic world, a '+' in front of write.imag
Hi,
I do not know if everybody finds index pages of the html-formatted R
help useful, but I know I am at least not the only one who uses them
extensively to get the overview of functions and methods in a package
(even for my own package). Problems arise, however, if a lot of S4
methods need to be
